<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Come Join The Poetry Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldclasspoetryblog.com/come-join-the-poetry-revolution/12/27/2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldclasspoetryblog.com/come-join-the-poetry-revolution/12/27/2007/</link>
	<description>Commentary On 21st Century Poetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:13:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclasspoetryblog.com/come-join-the-poetry-revolution/12/27/2007/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldclasspoetryblog.com/come-join-the-poetry-revolution/12/27/2007/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I was not aware of Dana Gioia back in 1989 but I know very well what it likes to be, if I can borrow from Little Britain, the only poet in the village:


COMING OUT

&quot;So you are a
practising poet ?&quot;
she asked,
and I felt unclean
and wanted my closet back.


23 March 1989


At that time, and this still remain true, I had only ever been to one poetry reading. I have no idea if it was typical – I was only there because I had been invited to submit a poem to a competition and this was the prize-giving. I went alone and never socialised. I didn&#039;t feel like I belonged. Yes, I was surrounded by other poets but I was so used to being an outsider that I didn&#039;t quite know what else to be.

I agree with #3 because, even now after 35 years of writing poetry, I still don&#039;t consider myself well-educated when it comes to poetry. The poet Basil Bunting kept explication of his poems to an absolute minimum – &quot;Never explain&quot; he advised fledgling poets &quot;your reader is as smart as you.&quot; No we&#039;re not. I spent a couple of hours yesterday flicking through the various poets included on the Electronic Poetry Center&#039;s site (http://epc.buffalo.edu/) and I was dismayed by how obtuse some of the writing was. It makes me wonder what the end of poetry should be. Naively I&#039;ve always thought that the bottom line should be meaning, a poem should make sense, but I can see that, for other poets, the bottom line is thinking, a poem should make you think – but how does the unsuspecting reader know what&#039;s expected of him?

As regards #5, judging by the state of poetry education in the UK, which has been commented on in the press recently, it&#039;s pretty clear that the teachers themselves need to spend more time on analysis before they have the brass neck to step out in front of a class. Since the majority of my poetry is very short, I&#039;ve never really considered poetry as a thing to be performed.

On #6, this obviously has been superseded by the internet. podcasts have the added benefit that you can play them again and again. A poet can include a text copy of the poem and even notes on the poem. The internet is definitely the place where educators should be setting up camp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not aware of Dana Gioia back in 1989 but I know very well what it likes to be, if I can borrow from Little Britain, the only poet in the village:</p>
<p>COMING OUT</p>
<p>&#8220;So you are a<br />
practising poet ?&#8221;<br />
she asked,<br />
and I felt unclean<br />
and wanted my closet back.</p>
<p>23 March 1989</p>
<p>At that time, and this still remain true, I had only ever been to one poetry reading. I have no idea if it was typical – I was only there because I had been invited to submit a poem to a competition and this was the prize-giving. I went alone and never socialised. I didn&#8217;t feel like I belonged. Yes, I was surrounded by other poets but I was so used to being an outsider that I didn&#8217;t quite know what else to be.</p>
<p>I agree with #3 because, even now after 35 years of writing poetry, I still don&#8217;t consider myself well-educated when it comes to poetry. The poet Basil Bunting kept explication of his poems to an absolute minimum – &#8220;Never explain&#8221; he advised fledgling poets &#8220;your reader is as smart as you.&#8221; No we&#8217;re not. I spent a couple of hours yesterday flicking through the various poets included on the Electronic Poetry Center&#8217;s site (<a href="http://epc.buffalo.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://epc.buffalo.edu/</a>) and I was dismayed by how obtuse some of the writing was. It makes me wonder what the end of poetry should be. Naively I&#8217;ve always thought that the bottom line should be meaning, a poem should make sense, but I can see that, for other poets, the bottom line is thinking, a poem should make you think – but how does the unsuspecting reader know what&#8217;s expected of him?</p>
<p>As regards #5, judging by the state of poetry education in the UK, which has been commented on in the press recently, it&#8217;s pretty clear that the teachers themselves need to spend more time on analysis before they have the brass neck to step out in front of a class. Since the majority of my poetry is very short, I&#8217;ve never really considered poetry as a thing to be performed.</p>
<p>On #6, this obviously has been superseded by the internet. podcasts have the added benefit that you can play them again and again. A poet can include a text copy of the poem and even notes on the poem. The internet is definitely the place where educators should be setting up camp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

