<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Write A Poem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldclasspoetryblog.com/how-to-write-a-poem/01/06/2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldclasspoetryblog.com/how-to-write-a-poem/01/06/2008/</link>
	<description>Commentary On 21st Century Poetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:25:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclasspoetryblog.com/how-to-write-a-poem/01/06/2008/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldclasspoetryblog.com/how-to-write-a-poem/01/06/2008/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Not much I can add to all that. My one regret is that there is not enough material to study. Sure there are poems aplenty but how do you study a poem? I&#039;ve always been a proponent of writers explaining their craft. Too many keep poetry shrouded in mystery and at a distance from anyone who doesn&#039;t already have a firm grasp of poetic nuances.

So often I want to ask a poet why they did things a certain way. The reason I don&#039;t most of the time is that I&#039;m pretty sure the answer will be because it felt right at the time which is not wrong in itself but it doesn’t help a fledgling poet much.

I&#039;ve recently sent away for two books covering the development of modern poetry because every book I&#039;ve ever read about &quot;modern&quot; poetry seems to end with the Mersey Poets and they&#039;re now the establishment. I&#039;m a bit behind the times.

I&#039;ve also just finished a lengthy blog about what differentiates poetry and prose. Not sure when I&#039;ll post it – I&#039;ve a few in hand – but watch out for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much I can add to all that. My one regret is that there is not enough material to study. Sure there are poems aplenty but how do you study a poem? I&#8217;ve always been a proponent of writers explaining their craft. Too many keep poetry shrouded in mystery and at a distance from anyone who doesn&#8217;t already have a firm grasp of poetic nuances.</p>
<p>So often I want to ask a poet why they did things a certain way. The reason I don&#8217;t most of the time is that I&#8217;m pretty sure the answer will be because it felt right at the time which is not wrong in itself but it doesn’t help a fledgling poet much.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recently sent away for two books covering the development of modern poetry because every book I&#8217;ve ever read about &#8220;modern&#8221; poetry seems to end with the Mersey Poets and they&#8217;re now the establishment. I&#8217;m a bit behind the times.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also just finished a lengthy blog about what differentiates poetry and prose. Not sure when I&#8217;ll post it – I&#8217;ve a few in hand – but watch out for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
